Blame The Defense, Not The Call
November 16, 2009 at 11:16am by Scott • 9 Comments »

I guess we might as well start with the call. When I first saw it happen, I was pretty sure it would be overturned on review because it seemed obvious that Michael Clayton‘s back had hit the ground before the ball came out. And when it wasn’t, I knew there had to be something I wasn’t seeing. Unlike SEC officials who can be PURCHASED AT ANY 7-11, NFL officials almost always have a legitimate reason for their calls after review, even if the rules they are following suck. And that’s what happened here.
The referee basically just re-iterated the rule in his explanation of the call, but go back and watch the play. Clayton’s left foot never hits the ground before he’s hit. John Lynch mistakenly says, “One foot down, two feet down” as he’s watching the replay, but that left foot never touches. I believe if he had had both feet down before he was hit for the first time, he would have been ruled down by contact. But since he had not yet “caught” the ball by having both feet on the ground, he had to maintain control all the way through the fall, and he didn’t. If two feet down means a catch, he legitimately lost control of the ball before he caught it, so there you go.
All that said, this rule about maintaining control to the ground has been a huge sore spot for several teams all season long and will definitely be looked at in the offseason. The ruling on Clayton’s interception doesn’t pass the eye test. It looks like a catch, and if you were to ask 100 random people about it, they would say it was a catch, too. Instant replay is great, but it has caused us to have to dissect too much shit and view the game in terms of milliseconds and make rules accordingly. It’s kind of taking some of the fun out of watching the game. It’s one of the things that John Madden would go on about that I totally agreed with. Officials would spend ten minutes looking at a player’s knee and exactly how much the ball was moving and where it was and whether he was switching hands or not to determine if it was a fumble and Madden would look at it in real time and say, “Of course it was a fumble! He dropped the ball before he hit the ground.” Sometimes we overthink shit.
I guess other things happened during the game as well. Josh Freeman has started a pattern of starting off slow and then picking his game up in the fourth quarter. He is also establishing a reputation as a fumbler. In two games plus a piece of a third, he has fumbled four exchanges from center and lost the ball three other times while scrambling. He has no clock in his head yet that tells him he needs to get rid of the ball whether or not someone is open, and that should develop with time. He needs to hold onto the ball regardless, but when a defensive end chops the ball out of his hand from behind while he’s scanning the field, that can be forgiven as a rookie mistake. But losing the snap from center — once even in his preferred shotgun — is inexcusable. Greg Olson the offensive coordinator needs to revert back to Greg Olson the quarterbacks coach for a little bit and help Freeman get this shit straightened out immediately. Once Freeman is outed as a fumbler, defensive ends and linebackers are going to be all over his shit trying to strip that ball away. This has to end now.
The good news about Freeman is that he’s making some nice passes and some decent decisions. He made a couple clutch throws to Kellen Winslow, a beautiful touchdown pass to Maurice Stovall, and another one to Stovall that he should have had, but dropped. The interception on his record (the Clayton call) totally wasn’t his fault, and if you take that away, he walks out with a 90.8 passer rating. Not too shabby. But most of all, he doesn’t get flustered when the team is trying to come from behind and keeps making his reads down the field.
Something that would help out Freeman is if Olson would call shorter-developing plays where the receivers can make quick breaks to get open. Let’s face it, the Bucs don’t exactly have burners for receivers. They’re not going to run away from anyone, so on these long-developing plays, they tend to get blanketed by the corners. These guys can be loosened up with some simpler plays to start out with. The receivers are quick enough in breaks to shake cover across the middle for a second and Freeman has a strong enough arm to drill the ball into tight windows. Let Clayton catch a pass and use his physicalness to gain a few extra yards. Set up the secondary for double moves later on in the game where the receivers can get better separation. When Freeman gets more confident in himself and in his relationship with his receivers, they won’t need to be as open for him. But for now, he needs that extra help and it’s up to Olson to provide it.
A solid running game would also help Freeman. The Bucs had a total of 84 rushing yards by the running backs, and it got to the point where the linebackers would wait until they actually saw the ball in the back’s hand before they played the run. Every week, the team has gotten further away from the zone-blocking scheme that they practiced all summer and begun playing more power blocking. Olson must think that the linemen are more suited to this style of play, but if you take away quarterback runs, the only 100 yard rushing game they’ve had is the first one where they played significantly more zone. Cadillac Williams is still running hard and breaking tackles, but runs that used to go to for 30 yards are being stopped after 9, and it’s not because the box is being stacked at the line all the time. The offensive line is flat getting beat a lot on run-blocking.
The game would have been a complete wash-out for the line if they hadn’t picked up their pass-blocking in the second half. They were miserable in protecting Freeman to start with and gave up three sacks in the first half. But FINALLY, a positive adjustment was made at halftime and they came out in the second half with much better protection, not giving up a sack.
The same can’t be said of the defensive line that had a total of seven tackles and no sacks. This defensive line is getting no pressure, can’t seem to stop the run, and is pretty much a huge damn mess. Is Greg White that much of a factor that his absence causes the rest of them to completely lose their shit? Tim Crowder made a couple nice plays and Chris Hovan made a couple decent tackles, but this is an embarrassment.
I lay equal blame on Jim Bates for not sending more blitzes when it’s obvious that the defensive line can’t get pressure on their own. Geno Hayes and Quincy Black are both athletic enough to get to the quarterback and cause some problems. This is Chad Henne we’re talking about, not an elite quarterback who will make you pay for blitzing. Send the fucking house once in a while. Hell, send Sabby Piscitelli. It’s not like he’s doing anything else.
I think I broke an ankle jumping off the Sabby bandwagon. That guy can go fuck a bowling pin as far as I’m concerned. Do they not teach geometry at Oregon State? Attack where the runner is going to be when you make your crazy dive, not where he is. Of course, if you wouldn’t leave your feet every time you try to make a tackle, it wouldn’t be as big a deal. You could always make a quick adjustment and limit the runner to a couple yards. Holy shit, I’ve never seen such poor tackling. Remember that 45-yard Ronnie Brown run? Brown doesn’t make that if Piscitelli does his job. Thanks for the forced fumble and knocking Brown out of the game, but it doesn’t make up for all the shitty tackling and overpursuits and late-arrivals to pass plays. You’re a great athlete, but that’s not enough. YOU CAN’T LIVE ON PERFECT ABS FOREVER, SABBY!
Let’s take a moment to congratulate Connor Barth, the guy I said wouldn’t make a difference and had a weak leg. Barth kicked three field goals, all for 50 yards or more. And they weren’t even close to being bad — all of them were straight down the middle with plenty of room to spare. And I don’t know if it was his or Rich Bisaccia‘s idea, but that rolling kickoff after Winslow’s penalty pushed them back to the 15 was brilliant. You’d think that ball was made of nuclear waste or dog shit or something the way the Dolphins were avoiding it. So, Connor, I was wrong. Keep it up.
The Bucs had a chance to win this one in the end, but when the defense was called on to secure the lead, they couldn’t keep Ricky Williams from running down their throat. Again, this season is now all about who is going to stay and who is going to be shown the door. And if today is any indication, there are going to be a lot of vacancies on the defensive line to fill this offseason.



9 Comments to “Blame The Defense, Not The Call”
PeaceDog5294 (November 16, 2009 at 11:31am) :
Two competitive games in a row, though. At least Sundays are becoming semi-enjoyable again. The upcoming Jets and Seahawks games look winnable. Will 3-13 still get us a top 3 pick???
Mark S (November 16, 2009 at 11:41am) :
I will start with the call. John Madden said one knee equals two feet. Surely one entire back equals one knee or two feet. Looking at it another way, a LB knocks a RB onto h is back. The RBs feet never touch the ground. He rebounds off of the turf back onto his feet. Was he down? Of course he was. I agree that the NFL is hurting the game with the current rule structure. They ask the refs to do too much and they think replay is a substitute for getting it right the first time.
Every week there is a comment about how the offensive line was almost good for an entire game. It should be obvious by now that they are not good enough. It is a major disappointment given the draft picks spent there. The OL and DL are our two major areas needing improvement. (I am leaving out QB, because I am hopeful Freeman will be the solution.)
Other than better pass protection, fielding the snap and faster developing routes; the other improvement would be getting Stroughter on the field more often. He is producing. When you have a TE as good as Winslow, the WRs should be getting single coverage and should be getting open.
Another thought about the call. You may think we cannot do anything about it. There is one thing we can do. Boycott all non-BUC NFL games. The NFL is all about the money. If we pulled off a boycott they would take notice.
Slow Joe (November 16, 2009 at 12:16pm) :
Excellent analysis, Scott. There isn’t much for me to add. But I’ll try anyway:
1. Defensive Line: A truly great defensive line only needs two studs. We won the Super Bowl with Warren Sapp, Simeon Rice, and two stiffs. Right now, we are rotating nothing but stiffs. None of the players are horrible, but none of them are studs, either. We need to draft some potential superstars for the defensive line, STAT. The back seven is already pretty talented, but our line is killing us.
It does make me curious as to what could have been if we had signed Albert Haynesworth and if Gaines Adams would have worked out. But Haynesworth is reputedly playing like the fat tub of shit that he is for the Redskins, so I guess no loss there.
Sabby Piscatelli: I’ve tried not being too hard on Sabby because I remember how much John Lynch struggled early on in his career. But the fact that Tanard Jackson was drafted the same year and seems to “get it”, and actually has gotten it ever since training camp of his rookie year, has really made Sabby look bad.
But yeah, it’s starting to get ridiculous how many poor decisions he makes. There isn’t a single Bucs game where I don’t scream “GODDAMMIT, SABBY!” at least twice. On the Ronnie Brown play, DON’T LEAVE YOUR GODDAMN FEET! He doesn’t need to make the SportsCenter big hit; just contain him, form tackle, neutralize his speed until help arrives!
It’s a good thing I didn’t have a brick in my hand when I saw that play.
Jim Bates: I still don’t like his defense. This year has been eye-opening to me how spoiled we’ve been as Bucs fans. From the last few games in 1996 to 12 games into 2008, we’ve always had the benefit of watching an above-average-to-truly-great defense play. Watching the defense this year has been mostly nauseating.
I can handle watching a mediocre offense. As a Bucs fan, it’s pretty much all I’ve known. But Bucs: please PLEASE PLEASE get this defense dominant again. I can’t handle teams marching down the field on us and winning like that. I don’t have anymore barf bags.
Scott (November 16, 2009 at 12:41pm) :
@PeaceDog: There are still three other teams with 1 win: Cleveland, Detroit and St. Louis. The good news is that Cleveland still plays Detroit, Oakland and Kansas City this year. They’ve got to win one of those, right? St. Louis plays Seattle, Chicago and Tennessee… they could win one of those maybe. Detroit plays Chicago, and that’s pretty much the only one they have a chance at winning. The Bucs will find it hard to win against anyone coming up. Maaaaaybe Carolina at home, but I’m not putting any money on it. So I’m thinking the Bucs pick either #1 or #2. And as soon as they pick Eric Berry, the Bucs should load Sabby up into a catapult and launch him into the bay. Or Pinellas Park, whichever is worse.
Of course it’s Pinellas Park.
Slow Joe (November 16, 2009 at 01:08pm) :
I’ve never seen Eric Berry play a single down, but the kid could be the second coming of Ronnie Lott and I’ll still not think you spend the first overall pick on a safety.
He plays safety, right?
We need defensive lineman!
Mark S (November 16, 2009 at 01:27pm) :
@Slow Joe, yes Eric Berry plays safety for the Vols. He is a great player, but I agree with you that DL is the more pressing need. I would say that after that OL is next and then Safety, CB and WR in that order. That is in no way an endorsement of Sabby. I hope he gets it, but I don’t think he will. CB is higher than WR because we need a better nickle back, depth and someone to groom as Ronde’s replacement. But that is dependent on re-signing AB. I think AB, Winslow and Stroughter are good enough.
campyone (November 16, 2009 at 02:04pm) :
I’m beginning to think there’s a possibility I might have to maybe tentatively admit that there’s a chance I was wrong about Freeman. Considering what’s surrounding him (or more accurately, what isn’t surrounding him) his play has been very encouraging. He’s had some problems but if you look at his college record he started out poorly but improved each season, indicating he can absorb instruction and learn from his mistakes. As for Eric Berry, if he’s available you take him, he’s as close to a sure-thing pro bowler as you’ll find in any draft, I don’t care what position he plays. We’ve been drafting linemen on the basis of need for what, the last three or four drafts, and how has that worked out?
christomahon (November 16, 2009 at 04:37pm) :
Re: “The Call”
Is it just me? Am I the only person who is upset with Clayton for not holing onto the ball???? Maybe I need to watch the replay but if it was a good call or bad call, wouldn’t it have been avoided if #80 just held onto the ball to start with?
I am totally on board with Freeman as the QB of this team. I think we have something to build with there and if he continues to play at and maybe a bit better than the level he is at right now, Raheem probably gets another year.
That being said, the draft is pretty simple.
We need talent at every single position on this team except maybe Tight End. Next years draft needs to be about one thing. Upgrading Talent. No need based drafts.
JScott (November 16, 2009 at 08:12pm) :
two of you nailed it already, but the Bucs definitely need to draft on a best player level. Drafting for need hasn’t quite worked out for them lately. If Berry is the best player, by all means take him.
I’m still pissed at Gruden for gushing all over DeSean Jackson earlier this season like he didnt have every opportunity to draft him. 99% of this fan base had the Bucs taking him in the first round that year… Talib is nice, but DeSean is a game changer, shame..
Comment on this post:
You must be logged in to post a comment.